A meritocracy

.
I would encourage you to look deeper into N.S. as was put in place in Germany 1933.

I'm all for NS.... I know all about it. Go read my post in this thread.

.
I would encourage you to look deeper into N.S. as was put in place in Germany 1933.

excerpt taken from General Leon Degrelle's "Hitler: Democrat":

". . . they all began to live as comrades, the workers knowing that the rich man's son was not a monster, and the young lad from the wealthy family knowing that the worker's son had honor just like another young fellow who had been more generously favored by birth.

Social hatred was disappearing. A socially united people was being born.
It was always like that in the Third Reich. No foreign spectator, however mulish, could fail to appreciate that.

Hitler had envisioned housing that would be beautiful, cozy, and on a grand scale. He didn't intend to house the German people as his predecessor had, in rabbit warrens. Those great barracks filled with human beings on the outskirt of labor town filled him with horror. Most of the houses he designed were single story detached dwellings, with a small garden where the kids could romp, the wife could gather a few salad greens, and the man could read his newspaper in peace after his day's work.

Loans amortizable in ten years were granted to newly married couples who wished to settle permanently in their homes. At the birth of each child, a fourth of the debt was canceled. Four children at the normal rate of a new arrival every two years and a half, and the family had no more payments to make.

(Degrelle) expressed (his) astonishment at this to Hitler one day.

"But then, you never get back the total amount of your loans?"
"How so?" he replied, smiling. "Over a period of ten years, a family with four children brings in more than our loans in the taxes levied on a hundred different items of consumption."

Every tax revenue increased proportionately with the increase in the cost of Hitler's social programs. Tax returns quite naturally tripled in a few years.

There was never a financial crisis in Hitler's Germany. . . "

"It is necessary that I should die for my people, but my spirit will rise from the grave, and the world will know that I was right."

(Adolf Hitler, 1889 - 1945)

******************

"Hitler began his rule by breaking with the international bankers. He
believed that Germany could never be a sovereign and really independent
state so long as she had to live on borrowed money. Instead of going to the
bankers for money to buy what she had to procure from abroad, she bartered
(that is, swapped) some of her surplus to obtain what she needed from the
surplus of other nations -- without debts being incurred on either side.
And with this approach Germany was soon crowding out all competitors.

Moreover, for the money required to finance her vast programs for a
complete regeneration of the life of the German people and for making
Germany the most powerful state in Europe, he simply issued what money was
needed, on the authority of the German government, and based it not on
gold, of which he had none, but on the productive wealth of the land within
German confines, combined with the productivity inherent in German brains
and German labor.

"And it proved sound. It worked. In less than ten years Germany became
easily the most powerful state in Europe. It worked so magically and
magnificently that it sounded the death knell of the entire Jewish money
system. World Jewry knew that they had to destroy Hitler's system, by
whatever means might prove necessary, or their own would necessarily die.
And if it died, with it must die their dream and their hope of making
themselves masters of the world. The primary issue over which World War II
was fought was to determine which money system was to survive. At bottom
it was not a war between Germany and the so-called allies. Primarily it
was war to the death between Germany and the International Money Power."

William Gayley Simpson, 'Which Way Western Man' (p.642)

.

Where can I find quotes from 'Which Way Western Man'?

-------

Here is the preamble to the US Constitution:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

I favor a Constitutional Republic with decentralization of the current massive federal power and the transfer of this power to the state. Limited government, usage based taxes, no foreign entanglements, limited military; libertarian leaning without all the metaphysical anti-human nature stuff.

Our current American government is an abomination that must be cleansed from the earth. The people should run the government, not vice versa.

.

Jerry Abbott edited it, I think, for the NA

Only 3 sources I see on a quick web search:

http://www.noontidepress.com/catalog/0457.html

http://resistance.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=26&products_id=579&osCsid=e265f933b8007550279a6091034b113f

http://www.natvan.com/cgi-bin/webc.cgi/st_prod.html?p_prodid=805

0457 Which Way Western Man?

[indent]

Which Way Western Man?, says Kevin Strom, producer of the “American Dissident Voices” radio series and editor of National Vanguard magazine, is “one of the most important books of the last one hundred years.” This book, he says, “is more than just a work of history, philosophy, and science, although it is all of that — it is also the story of a life, the life of an unusually sensitive and compassionate man, a man who could understand the mission of St. Francis as well as that of Nietzsche — a man who could see our position in the universe and relate it to the ordinary reader in a way that no other writer has ever done. I recommend Which Way Western Man? with my highest commendation. It is a life-changing book.”

This volume of more than a thousand pages is the product of the author’s life-long quest for understanding and truth. After graduating with high honors from a major theological seminary, William Gayley Simpson, became a Franciscan brother. Determined to live the simple Christian life preached by Jesus, he lived and worked for a time among the poor and disenfranchised. His experiences and his years of study, including immersion in the wisdom of the great thinkers of the past, ultimately led him to conclude that the most noble goal of enlightened mankind is to strive for ever-greater human excellence and quality. In this book, Simpson tackles such critical issues as the social roles of men and women, Jesus and his teachings, race, marriage, eugenics, the essential foundations of a sound society, pacifism, and much more.

In an introductory note, “To My Reader,” he writes:

“You may find in this book ideas or ideals that at first hearing strike you as abhorrent. They may clash with what you have long believed to represent the highest in human experience, or cherish as too holy to be questioned. Or you may find yourself chilled by conclusions that I reach or remedies that I press that you think too drastic. But I would remind you that the disintegration of our whole society is so far advanced, that the time allowed us for action is short, and that the peril hanging over us is fearsome. Extreme emergencies may require extreme measures. Our need is for men of the courage and independence of mind to set aside all taboos, men who will search and reassess the entire experience of our people with discernment and with insight, and will then have the resolution and the dedication to apply to the solution of our problems all the light and the fullest wisdom to which their search has led them, even though it cost them their lives.”

In the view of Revilo Oliver, professor of classics at the University of Illinois, Which Way Western Man? is “a veritable encyclopaedia of everything that is directly pertinent to our race’s position in the world today.” Dr. William Pierce, founder of the National Alliance, called it “a survival manual for the White race.”

Softcover. 1062 pages. Source references (#0457) $39.95

[/indent]

Ok, thanks.

----------

Yes, the caste system would be a open one with people going into the one that best suits them. But as of now I'm for a Aryan Pol Pot style goverment with Racism instead of marxism.

Didn't Pol Pot just murder all the educated people, even just people who wore glasses? I don't think that would be helpful for America.

With Jarl being the knowledgeable about which way western man, and since he is apparently a WN, he must be a super atheist.

.Hitler had envisioned housing that would be beautiful, cozy, and on a grand scale. He didn't intend to house the German people as his predecessor had, in rabbit warrens. Those great barracks filled with human beings on the outskirt of labor town filled him with horror. Most of the houses he designed were single story detached dwellings, with a small garden where the kids could romp, the wife could gather a few salad greens, and the man could read his newspaper in peace after his day's work.

Once an artist! By contrast, let's look at the aesthetic sensibilities of The Fuhrer's enemies:

When I visited the Imperial War Museum, London, I saw an exhibit on the postwar mass housing (I think they sardonically call them "estates") offerred to British vets. The "flat" they showed was so small it didn't have a dining room or even space for a regular kitchen table. Instead, there was just a board that would fold down into the middle of the kitchen during the meal and fold back up against the wall so people could move around again. That is the scene I will forever associate with John Charmley's profound comment that, in its finest hour, Britain hadn't won the war, she had merely failed to lose it.

Of course postwar 'Kwa isn't much better. The housing projects that many GI's immediately returned to are now deemed unsuitable even for niggers, and the prefabbed (kike) Levittown-type suburban subdivisions that they raised their families in are so soulless that the shopping mall is the greatest cultural attraction.

The leader of a nation is and always has been the guy who controls the money.
Ergo, if you thake the control of the nation's money out of the hands of the ostensible "leader of the nation", you've just insured someone else's control over the affairs of said nation.

Jerry Abbott edited it, I think, for the NA.

It was a privilege to edit Mr. Simpson's book and be the first to read it in its final revision. Twice.

It was a pain in the behind to try getting it proofread. We tried using volunteers for proofreading, and a few of them were pretty good. Some of them evidently couldn't care less, since they didn't do the work and their chapters had to be reassigned to others. Some returned their chapters with "corrections" that, in fact, were mistakes; some simply read Mr. Simpson's magnum opus and recommended content changes. In the end, for most of the book, I had to hope that I didn't make too many mistakes during editing. Of course, after it was published I did find a few. I always do.

And Dr. Bob, before he sent it to the printer, reformatted the page length to make the book smaller without a reduction in paper weight. It had been slightly too long for the printer to produce as one volume. Which caused one chapter to begin on a left-hand page (all the others begin on a right-hand page), some pages to be left blank that shouldn't have been, widow and orphan lines that weren't there when I released it to him, and the question mark at the end of the title on the spine is missing. I don't mean to be too critical of Dr. Bob: he had a lot to do and a small amount of time to do it in. It could have been worse.

(I remember now that Dr. Bob's computer didn't display the text in quite the same way that mine did. For that reason, I had wanted to send my version of the text to the printer as camera ready copy on high-quality paper, which would have cost us extra for postage. Dr. Bob sent an e-text on CD, which caused him to have to make the reformat to reduce the number of pages.)

But considering what a circus the proofreading cycle had become by that time, we were fortunate that the book turned out as well as it did.

I have my paper copy of WWWM, and I'd bought one for my brother. I might could find you some quotes, if I know what you are looking for.

Jerry Abbott

I advocate the destruction of post-Stone Age technology and a return to the hunter-gatherer/primary agriculture-based lifestyle.

I think the Athenian democracy would have won my vote unless its practice wouldn't be completely unfeasable to the present realities. It requires apt men, ready to defend their hard-won freedom with their lives. It is a democracy for men-only and only for a few of them. Masses are left into their natural state of slaves.

Our form of "democracy" before being adulterated by Jews differed from the Athenian in two important aspects:
- it was popular. Everyone is, in theory, equal to others. The sole condition for being granted such status was residing within the same political boundaries.
- it was bourgeois. Valuation was based on wealth, rather than intelligence, courage or virility.

Bourgeois mass democracy bases itself on 18th century humanistic philosophy, on high headed theories about the good nature of humans, their overall intelligence and the superior status of the free primitive against the civilized slave, all justifying a system of ABSOLUTE EQUALITY between mass members. Useless to say, these philosophers had no real contact out of their high class entourage. Their theories' failure to conform obvious (opposite) empirical evidence has never been addressed. Since they saw themselves as selfless revolutionaries (!), they have castigated just criticism as reactionary conservatism (wrong ahead of time), a practice continued to this day by marxists, the most fanatical followers of this mentality. These elite revolutionaries saw themselves as unreligious, YET they were followers for a cult of novelty and progress. They thought as time progresses, so does our society. Once again, this doesn't conform to empirical evidence, yet nobody was bothered by such trivial aspect.

Equality only exists in mathematics. National Socialism never tried to run counter to reality. To my knowledge, it remains the only modern ideology to accept reality as it is and try to correct our path from a road that leads to our invariable demise.

Didn't Pol Pot just murder all the educated people, even just people who wore glasses:eek:? I don't think that would be helpful for America.

A Pol-Pot number would do wonders, in keeping my computer virus- and pop-up window free